Open letter to the Remnant newspaper.

To the Remnant newspaper:

On the video "Why pope Francis is the Idol of secular media" the Remnant acknowledges between minutes 15:50 and 16:10 that pope Francis wanted to transform the Papacy into "Buenos Aires" where he allowed the Eucharist to be given away to many irregular couples....

Many have reported about this sacrilege, it is a certainty, this happened back in Buenos Aires, and we are not talking about when he allowed a belly for hire child from a transvestite and his couple to be baptized in a Catholic Temple, or manifesting in favor for homosexual civil unions to a gathering of Bishops... no, nothing compared to that, giving the Eucharist, the Holy flesh of God to the unrepentant, people in irregular marital situations knowing beforehand and not caring that's beyond bad. It seems that in the mind of many liberal priests and Bishops, as long "mercy" is provided, God would understand right? Like He could contradict Himself by "allowing" such a thing, thinking that God can give you a "break" and ignore His Holy Word...

"For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body, eats and drinks judgment on himself." 1 Cor 11:29

How about priests who don't care about the sinfulness of those who don't want to repent and worse, when those on top allows it and make it sure is alright...

47. The Church is called to be the house of the Father, with doors always wide open. One concrete sign of such openness is that our church doors should always be open, so that if someone, moved by the Spirit, comes there looking for God, he or she will not find a closed door. There are other doors that should not be closed either. Everyone can share in some way in the life of the Church; everyone can be part of the community, nor should the doors of the sacraments be closed for simply any reason. This is especially true of the sacrament which is itself “the door”: baptism. The Eucharist, although it is the fullness of sacramental life, is not a prize for the perfect but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak. These convictions have pastoral consequences that we are called to consider with prudence and boldness. Frequently, we act as arbiters of grace rather than its facilitators. But the Church is not a toll house; it is the house of the Father, where there is a place for everyone, with all their problems. (Evangelii Gaudiim #47)

Please define Sacrilege my brethren... you like to shout to the heavens how seriously wrong this papacy is doing things, which is true, Francis has being like this since always; Sacrilege... which is more than heresy, more than apostasy itself, Sacrilege by someone who knows (Mario Bergoglio, Francis), is more grave than someone who don't know the faith, but Judas knew and didn't care.

Catholic Law says that a heretic cannot become pope even with the majority of the votes, yet the remnant newspaper likes to flash laws in all their videos and articles and ignore what Jesus said, that we shouldn't follow false prophets... priests being allowed to give the Eucharist in a such irresponsible way and the Remnant acknowledging that this actually happened and then say: "yeah he is a validly elected pope", we need to ask ourselves: do they know something we don't? About how sacrilege operates and is?

I don't doubt people being happy about the confusion overflowing by Francis and how faithful priests stay silent while the flock falls away, I don't doubt the Remnant's compromise to the truth, but like some, who defends the truth up to certain extend, we need to tell you, truth needs to be defended all the way, in its fullness not just a large part, the entire truth.

A heretic cannot be pope, so Francis is not pope, by his many transgressions, his gigantic and horrible Sacrilege which is solidified by that #47 exhortation. The actions of those who he appointed, those who have given the Eucharist to wicked people (Wuerl, Cuppich...) has given lights in whom he really is, a false prophet.

True, it is too easy to say "he is not pope", yes it's easy to say he is a false prophet, yes it's easy to judge, yes it's easy to point out the wood in our brothers eyes and not see our own, and sedevacantism has been a sin and will always been a sin, but telling the truth is not a sin... we are not sedevacantist, I have love every pope I had since childhood, and all were valid despite a flawed council... but calling people sedevacantists, because they consider pope Francis not a true pope but an antipope, a Judas, a false prophet, because they have seen the truth in the light of this sacrilege and many more evidences that puts question marks on the validity of this papacy, is irresponsible and you need to apologize.

Resisting this pope and denouncing the demolition, denouncing the lies is the right thing to do, our rosaries, sacrifice, and our NO to the false Mercy preach from the top is a must... 

Our Lady of La Salette said it, "Rome will lose the faith and becomes the seat of the Antichrist" and I'm not saying he is the Antichrist, but he's sure helping him.

God bless Archbishop Lefebvre for his commitment to the truth, God bless pope Benedict for the Light he has shown, God bless Mr. Voris for defending the truth up to an extent... the truth suffers violence and it is not my wish to scorn good people and you are, excellent people, I would give my life for you in an instant... but saying "Yeah the pope gave the Eucharist away in Argentina to irregular couples" and also saying "Francis is valid", while it is Law that NO heretic can become pope, admitting he is guilty of such crime in Argentina and pointing fingers at what you call "sedevacantists" for saying he is FALSE, is a slap on the face.

Maybe I'm wrong... maybe I'm living in a world were giving away the Eucharist to the unrepentant, confirming heretic Bruno Forte, letting Wuerl to handle the next Synod, and letting cardinal Kasper to spread poison is not confirming LIBERALISM, which, is right there sitting at the top. 

LIBERALISM and PETER cannot co-exist, just ask St Paul when he rebuked Peter... Francis IS not a true pope because he was a heretic then, he is a heretic now and my proof is everywhere in his bad fruits...

Lastly... LIBERALISM and PETER cannot co-exist, Peter is the rock, not a lot of sand, apologize Remnant and continue your spot on work... I love you in Jesus Christ.

Dr. Rafael Gonzalez

A Neo-catholic who happens to love the Latin mass.

Author of The Treasure of the Heavens: The biggest robbery in history, the art of war and diamonds books.